INVESTIGATION OF AN ACCIDENT WHICH OCCURRED
ON THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD AT GOTHENBURG, NEBR., ON MARCH
14, 1913.
APRIL 16, 1913.
TO THE COMMISSION:
On March 14, 1913, there was an accident on the Union Pacific
Railroad at Gothenburg, Nebr., which resulted in the death
of 4 passengers and the injury of 13 passengers.
Eastbound passenger train No. 4 was en route from San Francisco,
Cal., to Chicago,IL. it consisted of 1 refrigerator car,
1 mail car, 3 baggage cars, 2 chair cars, and 1 sleeping
car, in the order given, all cars being of steel construction
excepting the first and last cars, which were of wood. The
train was hauled by engine No. 153, and was in charge of
Conductor Hull and Engineman O'Brien. Train No. 4 left North
Platte, Nebr., 35.4 miles west of Gothenburg, at 2:18 a.
m, 2 hours and 58 minutes late, passed Brady Island, 12.7
miles from Gothenburg, and the only open telegraph office
between North Platte and Gothenburg at 3.15 a. m., 3 hours
and 17 minutes late, and arrived at Gothenburg at 3.35 a.
m. At about 3.37 a. m., while the necessary station work
was being done, the rear end of train No. 4 was struck by
train No. 12.
Eastbound train No. 12 was en route from Denver, Colo.,
to Chicago, IL. It consisted of 1 mail car, 1 baggage car,
2 coaches, and 2 sleeping cars. The baggage car and the
first sleeping car were of wood, while the last sleeping
car had a steel underframe; the rest of the cars were of
steel construction. The train was hauled by engine No. 133,
and was in charge of Conductor Harding and Engineman Weinberger.
It left North Platte at 2:34 a. m., 16 minutes behind train
No. 4, passed Brady Island at 3.19 a. m., 4 minutes behind
train No. 4, and collided with that train at about 3.37
a. m., as above stated.
Train No. 4 was driven forward about 100 feet by the force
of the collision. The wooden sleeping car err the rear end
of train No. 4 was demolished, as is shown by illustration
No. 1. With the exception of the vestibule, the steel coach
immediately ahead of it was very little damaged. The condition
of this car is shown by illustration No. 2. The mail car
in train No. 4 and the forward end of engine No. 133 were
slightly damaged. The speed of train No. 12 was probably
about 15 miles per hour at the time of the collision. Estimates
as to how long train No. 4 had been standing at the station
at Gothenburg varied from one to two minutes, the majority
placing it at the latter figure.
This division of the Union Pacific Railroad is a double-track
line, train movements being governed by automatic block
signals, so arranged that when a block is occupied the home
signal governing the entrance to that block shows red and
yellow, the danger signal, and indicates stop; the distant
signal at the entrance of the preceding block shows yellow
and green, the caution signal, and indicates proceed under
control; while the signal at the entrance of the second
preceding block shows double green, signifying clear, and
permits full speed. When out of order the signals stand
at danger. In the vicinity of the point of accident the
track is straight for several miles in either direction,
with a slight descending grade for eastbound trains. The
track, roadbed, and signal equipment were well constructed
and in excellent condition. The first block signal west
of the station governing the movements of eastbound trains,
No. 2556, is located 1,069 feet west of the station. The
next signal, No. 2562, is located 2,427 feet west of No.
2556; signal No. 2572 is located 5,680 feet west of signal
No. 2562, while the next signal is more than a mile west
of signal No. 2572.
During the night in which this accident occurred the automatic
signals governing the single-track bridge across the Platte
River, which is about 1 mile east of North Platte and about
34 miles west of Gothenburg, were out of order and stood
at danger throughout the night, all trainmen being notified
accordingly. A condition of this nature is governed by rule
No. 504, which reads as follows:
When a train is stopped by a block signal it may proceed
when the signal is clear. On single tracks, send a flagman
in advance immediately; wait the full time indicated by
special rules on the timetable (which is five minutes) after
the flagman has started, and then proceed under control
to the next clear signal, or, if the signal in advance is
in plain view and the track ahead is seen to be clear, proceed
under control not to exceed 6 miles per hour.
Train No. 4 obeyed this rule and consumed 17 minutes in
crossing the bridge. On the arrival of the train at Gothenburg,
Flagman Frosch dropped off the rear end of the train and
started back to take his position 60 feet from the rear
of his train as required by rule. When he had gone back
nearly the required distance he heard a whistle, indicating
the approach of a train, and he at once lighted a red fusee
and began running back, waving the lighted fusee as he did
so. He testified that his signal was seen and answered by
the engineman of train No. 12. When train No. 12 stopped
after the collision Flagman Frosch was about 1 car length
west of the rear end of that train.
Supt. Cahill stated that several years ago instructions
were issued to passenger-train flagmen reading about as
follows:
On passenger frame where working time-card shows a regular
station stop, flagman will immediately take his position
60 feet from the rear of his train with proper flagging
equipment and be prepared to protect his train should an
emergency arise requiring protection. After waiting five
minutes, if his train does not depart, flagman will immediately
go back with proper flagging equipment and protect his train
as per rule No. 99. Flagman will go back without waiting
to be whistled out by his engineman and will remain back
until recalled by the engine whistle or relieved by another
flagman. At any intermediate stop between stations flagman
will go back at once with proper flagging equipment and
prepare to protect his train as per rule No. 99.
Gothenburg is a regular station stop for train No. 4, and
Flagman Frosch complied with the instructions applicable
at the time.
At the time of the accident a blizzard was raging, said
to be the worst in many years, with a heavy snow falling
and a high wind. On this account the conductor of train
No. 12, finding the signals out of order at the Platte River
Bridge, instructed his engineman to carry the flagman on
the engine and proceed slowly across the bridge in this
manner, not deeming if safe for the flagman to walk across
the bridge ahead of the train on account of the storm. This
plan was carried out and train No. 12 consumed about 10
minutes in making the crossing, thus gaining 7 minutes at
this point on train No. 4. As previously stated, the two
trains were 16 minutes apart leaving North Platte, and they
were therefore 9 minutes apart when leaving the east side
of the Platte River, while the interval between the two
trains was further shortened on account of train No. 12
making no stops on route. Engineman Weinberger stated that
on approaching signal No. 2582 he found it to be in the
caution position, but before passing it, it changed to clear.
Signal No. 2572 was also found to be in the clear position,
while signal No. 2562 was found to be at caution. He at
once shut off steam and applied the air brakes, reducing
the speed of his train to about 20 miles per hour. On account
of the wind carrying smoke and snow to the south, he missed
signal No. 2556 entirely, and while drifting along and trying
to locate his position suddenly saw the red fuses being
waved by the flagman of train No. 4. He at once applied
the emergency brakes, just after which the collision occurred.
On account of having some little difficulty in keeping up
steam, the fireman of engine No. 153 saw none of the signals
during the run from North Platte to the point of accident,
and the first intimation he had of trouble was when he noticed
the red fuses as he reached up to put on the blower.
Rule No. 302 of the Union Pacific book of rules provides
as follows:
Enginemen finding a distant signal at "caution"
must immediately bring their trains under control, and be
prepared to stop before reaching the home signal. They are
reminded that although the distant signal indicates the
position of the home signal, the home signal may assume
the stop position after the distant signal has given the
clear indication, and while the train is between the distant
and home signal. For this reason enginemen and trainmen
must be on the alert, prepared to bring the train to a stop
if the home signal indicates stop, and be governed by rule
504.
That part of rule No. 504 to which rule No. 302 refers reads
as follows:
On double track, a train may proceed after waiting one minute,
running under control.
Rule No. 508 provides that when an engineman enters a block
under these rules he will be held responsible in case of
an accident caused by overtaking the preceding train.
Under these rules Engineman Weinberger is responsible for
the collision, for he failed to have his train under control
and was not prepared to stop at the home signal, which was
in the stop position; in fact, according to his own testimony,
he ran his train by this home signal without seeing it.
On account of the caution distant signal, Engineman Weinberger
knew that the home signal at that time indicated danger,
meaning that the next block was not clear for the safe passage
of his train, and, in view of the unusually severe weather
conditions prevailing at the time, he should have been particularly
careful to have had his train under such control as to have
been able to see the home signal and be governed by its
indication.
Engineman Weinberger had been employed as such by the Union
Pacific Railroad since October 25, 1899, previous to which
he had had more than eight years' experience as a fireman.
His record was good, the only demerits charged against it
being for causing the delay of a passenger train on one
occasion. His reputation was excellent. At the time of the
accident he had been on duty 2 hours and 17 minutes, previous
to which he had been off duty more than 30 hours.
Respectfully submitted.
H. W. BELNAP,
Chief Inspector of Safety Appliances.