ACCIDENT ON THE UNION PACIFIC
RAILROAD CHARD, WASH.
FEBRUARY 15, 1939
INVESTIGATION NO. 2331
SUMMARY
Railroad: Union Pacific
Date: February 15, 1939
Location: Chard, Wash.
Kind of accident: Derailment
Train involved: Freight
Train number: 356
Engine number: 706
Consist: 7 cars, caboose
Speed: 10-15 m.p.h.
Operation: Timetable and train orders
Track: Single; tangent; 0.75 percent ascending grade eastward
Time: 6:15 a.m.
Weather: Cloudy
Casualties: 2 injured
Cause: Bridge collapsed under engine, having been weakened
because of high water.
March 22, 1939.
To the Commission:
On February 15, 1939, there was a derailment of a freight
train on the Union Pacific Railroad near Chard, Wash., which
resulted in the injury of two employees.
Location and method of operation
This accident occurred on that part of the Washington Division
designated as the Pomeroy Branch which extends between Starbuck
and Pomeroy, Wash., a distance of 28.9 miles; this is a single-track
line over which trains are operated by timetable and train
orders, no form of block system being in use. The accident
occurred at bridge 13.03 which is located 1.5 miles west of
Chard. Approaching from the west there is a 3 degree curve
to the right 1,778 feet long, followed by 364 feet of tangent
to the bridge and a considerable distance beyond. The grade
is 0.75 percent ascending eastward.
From Pomeroy to a point about 16 miles west thereof the railroad
closely follows the course of Pataha Creek. Bridge 13.03 spans
Pataha Creek at a point about 13 miles east of Starbuck; this
bridge was a common standard pile trestle for light traffic
lines, 104.8 feet long, with a maximum height of about 23.7
feet from the base of the rail to the ground line. It consisted
of 7 spans, supported on 8 frame bents of 5 cedar piles each
which varied from 22 to 32 feet in length and measured 14
to 16 inches in diameter at the ground line, driven to penetration
that varied from 5 to 23 feet; all bents were provided with
4 by 8-inch sway braces, and in addition bents 4, 5 and 6,
numbered from the west, were provided with two 6 by 8-inch
horizontal sash braces. The caps were 12 by 14 Inches by 12
feet, laid on the 14-inch surface; there were six 8 by 17-inch
stringers, three under each rail. The ties were 8 by 8 inches
by 9 feet, laid on 12-inch centers. The two bents at each
end of the bridge were spaced 14.5 feet, and the others were
15 feet apart. The bridge was designed to carry safely four
engine driving-wheel axle-loads of 47,000 pounds each, with
engine-wheel centers 5 feet apart, corresponding to Cooper's
E-47 rating. That portion of the bridge consisting of the
second to seventh bents was built in 1925; in 1930 the seventh
bent was redriven and the eighth bent added; in 1933 the first
bent was installed.
Pataha Creek varies in width from 25 to 60 feet and at some
places it is 20 feet deep. It flows southward and has a drainage
area of about 175 square miles from its headwaters to the
point of accident.
The track structure on the bridge consists of 56-pound rail,
30 feet In length, laid on 30 ties to the rail length. The
maximum authorized speed on tangent track is 20 miles per
hour.
Rules 1657 and 1732 of the maintenance-of-way department provide
a follows:
1657. During threatening or prevailing storms or high water,
wherein track or any portion of the railroad's property is
liable to suffer damage, foremen and trackmen must be on duty,
whether by day or night, and must not await instructions from
the train dispatcher or roadmaster, but must carefully patrol
their entire sections to make sure that the track is safe,
taking necessary signals with them.
1732. During severe storms or extraordinary freshets, bridge
foremen must be on duty, and when possible, must place themselves
in communication with telegraph stations, ready to go at once
with their men to repair any damaged structures. They must
assure themselves that the structures in their vicinity are
not being damaged and must take all necessary precautions
for the safety of trains. In case of damage by storm or fire
which may endanger or prevent the passage of trains, they
must promptly notify the train dispatcher, division engineer
and, supervisor of bridges and buildings, and at once take
measures to stop trains if necessary, and to repair the damage.
The engine involved was of the Schenectady Consolidation or
2-8-0 type, with a total engine weight of 155,000 pounds,
distributed on the axles as follows: engine truck, 18,000
pounds; each pair of drivers, 34,250 pounds. The distance
between centers of the first and second pair of drivers was
5 feet 4 inches, and of the others, 5 feet; the length of
the driving-wheel base was 15 feet 4 inches, and the total
wheel base of the engine was 23 feet 8 inches. The length
of the wheel base of the tender was 16 feet 3 inches. The
over-all length of the engine and tender was 60 feet 11-inches,
The loaded weight of tender was 121,250 pounds, and the total
weight of engine and tender in working order was 276,250 pounds.
Heavy rain had fallen in this locality during the evening
of February 14, but the rain had stopped and it was dark and
cloudy at the time of the accident, which occurred about 6:15
a.m.
Description
No. 356, an east-bound freight train, consisted of eight cars
and a caboose, hauled by engine 706, and was in charge of
Conductor Lingow and Engineman Yenter. This train left Starbuck
at 5:10 a.m., according to the train sheet, 3 hours 10 minutes
late, set out one car at Delaney, 8 miles distant, then proceeded
about 5 miles beyond and while crossing bridge 13.03 at a
speed estimated to have been between 10 and 15 miles per hour,
the trestle collapsed under the engine.
The engine stopped upright on the east bank of Pataha Creek,
with its forward end headed upward and projecting above the
bank; bridge ties, stringers and rails were under the engine;
the tender and the first two cars were in the streambed. The
employees injured were the engineman and the fireman.
Summary of evidence
Engineman Yenter stated that the air brakes were tested at
Starbuck and they functioned properly en route. It had been
raining at Starbuck on February 14, and on this trip he received
a slow order that read, "Account soft weather conditions
watch carefully for mud and rock slides, falling rocks and
excessive water flowing in ditches or flowing over track.
Lose time necessary for safety. Safety is first consideration."
En route the speed was from 10 to 14 miles per hour, and after
having passed over about four bridges and having checked in
each case for debris, driftwood and high water he began to
feel that everything was fairly safe. The headlight was burning
and daylight was just breaking. He did not make any air-brake
application while ascending the grade at bridge 13.03. The
cab window was open and he looked at the creek and there seemed
to be only about 3 feet of water. The bridge appeared intact
in every respect and there was no sag or dip thereon; he started
across it carefully, and after entering about the length of
the engine the bridge collapsed. He said that on previous
occasions he had seen it rain much harder than it did in this
instance, and that he had crossed this bridge when the water
under it was 8 or 9 feet deep.
Fireman Shaw substantiated the statement of Engineman Yenter,
but estimated the speed to have been 10 or 12 miles per hour
when the bridge collapsed under the engine.
Head Brakeman Tehan, who was also on the engine, practically
corroborated the statement of the engineman; he was not alarmed
or unduly concerned about weather conditions, or the possibility
that high water would cause any dangerous condition; he saw
no debris in streams en route and when the reflection from
the headlight shown on the rails as the engine approached
the bridge involved it appeared intact and there was no unevenness
of track. He thought that one or more of the bents of the
bridge had gone out before the engine reached it, and estimated
the speed to have been not over 15 miles per hour when the
accident occurred.
Conductor Lingow stated that it rained hard during the afternoon
of February 14, but when he went on duty at Starbuck at 10:30
p.m. it was only drizzling, then it cleared up and did not
rain any more. There was no water of consequence in any of
the streams en route, and no cause for alarm about weather
conditions. The speed was about 13 to 15 miles per hour and
he had no thought but that the bridge was safe. He was in
the caboose cupola and was not aware of anything wrong until
the train stopped suddenly. After the accident he looked at
the water in the creek and it was about 3 feet deep; ordinarily
the water is about 2 feet deep. On previous occasions he had
seen it much higher, and for a considerable portion of the
year the creek bed is dry.
Flagman Dagget was also in the caboose cupola when the accident
occurred; his statement corroborated that of the conductor.
Section Foreman Bowman, located at Pomeroy, stated that he
was assigned to the territory involved in February, 1923.
Since last fall his force consisted of himself and one laborer.
His section is about 20 miles long and he does not cover the
entire section every day. During the morning of February 14
he was working at the west end of the section. It started
to sprinkle before noon, but about noon while he and the section
laborer were at Dodge, 1.8 miles east of Chard, it started
to rain moderately and continued in varying intensity. About
4:30 p.m. the roadmaster inquired about weather conditions
and instructed him not to take any chances. It then began
to rain harder and the section foreman watched Pataha Creek
very closely; at 7 p.m. he called his man and they patrolled
the track by section motor-car; it was still raining when
they started out. All bridges were carefully inspected to
determine that every pile was in place; after reaching the
west end of the section they returned eastward to Jackson,
1.6 miles west of the point of accident, arriving there shortly
after 10 p.m. They remained at Jackson until about 11:15 p.m.,
then continued eastward toward Pomeroy, again carefully inspecting
all bridges en route and found all clear and the water flowing
freely under them. The water at bridge 13.03 had receded about
one foot, there being about 3 to 3 1/2 feet of water flowing
under it, about 11:30 p.m.; this was slightly above normal;
there was no accumulation of debris and he was satisfied that
the bridge was all right. They found bridge 23.96 located
10.88 miles east of bridge 13.03, blocked with debris and
driftwood; this was the only bridge on the line where such
a condition was seen to exist. He instructed the section man
to protect this bridge by placing torpedoes and he, alone,
proceeded to Pomeroy to inspect the bridge there. When he
left Pomeroy about 1:30 a.m., February 15, the bridge at that
point was all right and the water had receded about 2 feet.
Returning to bridge 23.96 he found the water receding rapidly,
so they continued westward about 6 miles to milepost 18; the
water under the various bridges was receding more and more
and no alarm was felt; they returned to bridge 23.96, and
by this time the water was down considerably and the drift
had settled; they remained there until 3:30 a.m. and he was
satisfied that danger from water was past. They then departed
for home, and arrived there about 4:10 a.m. Shortly after
6:30 a.m. he was informed of the accident; he proceeded, to
that point, arriving about 7 a.m., and at that time the water
had entirely receded. After the water receded during the night
he thought that there would not be any danger of drift or
debris coming down against bridge 13.03. He had seen the water
four or five times higher in the past. A few years ago rip-rap
was placed under the bridge Involved. Several years previously
an ice jam broke off a pile at this bridge but no other trouble
had been experienced. Since he had been on this section none
of the bridges from a point 3 miles west of the bridge involved
to a point 3 miles west thereof had previously been blocked
with drift.
Roadmaster Pratt stated that no previous trouble had been
experienced with the bridges on the Pomeroy Branch being blocked.
He was not unduly alarmed about weather conditions in this
instance. Apparently there was a jam somewhere along the creek
that retarded the water above bridge 13.03, and when it broke
loose it came down against the bridge. After the accident
there was considerable debris and drift below the bridge,
including poles, trees and branches. He last inspected the
bridge with the division engineer and the bridge and building
supervisor on January 27, 1939, and there was nothing wrong
with it at that time.
Bridge and Building Supervisor Searles stated that the last
annual inspection of bridge 13.03 was made in October, 1938,
and the last general inspection in January, 1939. A steel
bar was used to test the piles, and they were found to be
in good condition, with very little sap rot. All piles had
been driven to full penetration; the base was solid. After
the accident he observed that bents 4 and 5 were missing from
bridge 13.03 and that the stringers had broken off at the
top of the cap of bent 3; bents 6 and 7 had kicked eastward
under the locomotive. At that time the water was about 3 feet
deep, but there was evidence on the north branch of Pataha
Creek to show that at some time the water had reached a height
of 9 feet. Bent 5 was washed downstream to a point 80 feet
below the bridge and there was considerable debris wrapped
around the lower end of the bent; where the piling had been
broken off it was sound. A quantity of rip-rap, probably 30
or 40 yards, had also been displaced. Piles 1, 2, 3 and 4
in bent 5 had been broken off and the top of pile 5 had been
pushed out from under the cap; piles 1 and 2 were split from
the point where they broke off. Piles 1, 2 and. 3 in bent
4 were broken off. The breaking of the piles in bents 4 and
5 indicated that a heavy pressure built up until the piling
snapped. In his opinion the piling snapped off and had gone
from under the bridge before the train arrived.
Bridge and Building Foreman Stone had worked on the Pomeroy
Branch at different times during the past 25 years. He said
that it was possible for enough drift and debris to back up
and to cause the piling to break of f as occurred at bridge
13.03; he had seen bridge bents on this branch line that had
broken off but never any that had been pulled out.
General Bridge Inspector Drew stated that bridge bents 1,
2 and 3 were standing; bents 6, 7 and 8, with the deck on
top of them, were under the engine Piles 1, 2 and 3 of bent
4 with bracing bolted thereto were found about 3.5 miles downstream,
pile 4 was lodged at a point 2.9 miles downstream and pile
5 was not found. Piles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of bent 5 were broken
off just above the stream-bed line and pile 5 had been pulled
out. A cloud-burst occurred in this locality during the night
and he estimated that the crest of the water reached bridge
13.03 about 2:30 or 3 a.m., February 15. Apparently drift
lodged against the bridge and raised the water on the up stream
side 4 feet higher than on the downstream side and this was
sufficient to exert a pressure strong enough to break off
both bents. In his opinion it was entirely possible that the
bridge could have been in the condition at 11:30 p.m., February
14, s described by the section foreman, and subsequently become
completely clogged with sufficient drift to back the water
on the upstream side to a depth of 9 feet, as indicated by
high water marks, and to force out bents 4 and 5, leaving
the deck suspended as it undoubtedly was when the train involved
arrived so that the bridge appeared intact to the crew when
the reflection from the headlight shone on the rails. In order
to eliminate all possibility of drift it would be necessary
to patrol constantly the stream above the bridge to its source
and between all bridges during flood periods; this would be
almost prohibitive in cost. As the most economical and practical
solution to prevent the recurrence of similar accidents, consideration
is being given to the construction of bridges with longer
spans so that the drift will pass more freely through the
openings.
Resident Engineer Murray stated that the local observer at
the U. S. Weather Bureau, Pomeroy, Wash., reported 0.62 inch
of rainfall between the hours of 4 p.m., February 14, and
4. p.m. February 15; however, no information could be obtained
to indicate the exact hours during which this rainfall occurred.
After the accident he noticed that a large amount of rip-rap
of various sizes had been washed downstream; some pieces weighing
as much as 2 or 3 tons had been washed down as far as 200
feet. In his opinion the great volume of water coming down
against the debris that lodged against the bridge caused the
piling to break off.
Division Engineer Kidder stated that during the summer time
Pataha Creek is practically dry, and at the time of the year
when this accident occurred the normal flow of water under
bridge 13.03
is from 1 1/2 to 2 feet in depth. It was evident that a considerable
amount of drift was carried down the stream and lodged against
the bridge, backing the water until the pressure finally,
broke the piling in bents 4 and 5. The crest of water evidently
passed after the section foreman left bridge 13.03 at 11:30
p.m., February 14; and before he reached bridge 23.96. In
his opinion bents 4 and 5 had been displaced before the train
started across the bridge.
Observations of the Commission's Inspectors
The Commission's inspectors observed that at a point 177 feet
north of the bridge the creek narrows to 37 feet with the
banks about 25 feet high, and the stream makes an abrupt bend,
directing the flow almost straight at the bridge. At the narrow
point marks on the bank indicated that the water had been
about 9 feet high and from that point downstream to a short
distance below the bridge these marks tapered downward to
about 5 feet, indicating that somewhere in the vicinity of
the abrupt turn a drift jam had formed.
Discussion
During the night of February 14-15, a heavy rain fell within
the watershed area of Pataha Creek but some distance above
bridge 13.03. The section foreman and his laborer had patrolled
the track during the night and had made two inspections of
bridge 13.03 and determined that every pile was in place.
The last inspection of this bridge was completed by them at
11:30 p.m. and at that time there was no accumulation of debris;
the water in the creek had receded about one foot and there
was only about 3 to 3 1/2 feet of water flowing in the stream,
which was slightly above normal. Driftwood had accumulated
at a bridge about 10 miles east of the bridge involved but
it had cleared by 1:30 a.m. and the water had receded; they
again inspected westward to a bridge within 5 miles of the
bridge involved and finding all bridges intact and the water
receding they returned to their homes at 4:10 a.m. From the
evidence it appeared that the crest of the water reached the
bridge involved about 2:30 or 3 a.m. and that drift and debris
lodged against the bridge which raised the water on the upstream
side to a height of 9 feet. Apparently the crest of the flood
had passed bridge 23.96 before 11:30 p.m. while the sectionmen
were in the vicinity of bridge 13.03 and as they proceeded
eastward they passed it at some point where the track was
not close enough to the stream for them to either see or hear
it; the driftwood they found at bridge 23.96 had been deposited
by the crest as it passed that point, but when they reached,
bridge 23.96 the water was receding and they saw no dangerous
condition. That there was a great pressure exerted is evidenced
by the facts that the piling of two bents were broken off
at the stream-bed line, parts of which were found 3.5 miles
downstream and that pieces of rip-rap weighing as much as
2 or 3 tons were washed downstream a distance of 200 feet.
After bents 4 and 5 were displaced the deck of the bridge
was left suspended and unsupported a distance of 45 feet.
No. 356 arrived at 6:15 a.m. proceeding cautiously, and the
bridge appeared intact to the crew when the reflection from
the headlight shone on the rails. It entered upon the bridge
at a speed estimated at 10 to 15 miles per hour, but when
reaching a point about midway thereof the bridge collapsed.
Several years ago trouble had been experienced at bridge 13.03
by an ice jam, but no previous trouble had been experienced
with drift, debris or high water. During the summer time Pataha
Creek is practically dry, and during February the normal flow
of water under this bridge is 1 1/2 to 2 feet. On this occasion
the water reached a height of 9 feet at a bend in the stream
located 177 feet above the bridge. In order to prevent the
recurrence of a similar accident consideration is being given
to the construction of bridges with longer spans so that drift
and debris can pass more freely through the openings.
Conclusions
This accident was caused by the collapse of a wooden bridge,
which had been weakened by two bents being broken off and
forced from under it because of pressure exerted by debris
and high water.
|